Friday, 12 March 2010

Comments from the Feedback we received

We agree with the majority of the comments made in the feedback from our class. What was said was helpful for us to see how the audience perceived our thriller opening. From the comments that were given to us, it has allowed our group to consider what we could possibly change/alter to make our thriller more successful and conventional. The main priority that we have now to improve our work is to firstly come up with a title for our thriller as this is important to meet the criteria of the opening to a thriller.

Some critisms that have been made we agree with, for example the fact that the sound quality of the dialogue is quite poor is an aspect of our work that needs improving and as a result, this is our main priority to resolve. One comment from our feedback that we disagreed with was that some people viewed our mise-en-scene in a negative way, by saying that aspects of the narrative were left unexplained. Although that this may have affected the audiences understanding, our group thought that it fitted well with the conventions of a thriller by adding an element of mystery that would intrigue the audience to find our more.

We also recieved mixed views about two aspects of our opening - firstly, people had a variation of views about the rabbit mask at the end, saying that it ruined the ending, whereas others believed it made the opening more thrilling. However, we think that this an one aspect that makes our work look as though it is meant to be an opening rather than an ending. Additionally, people views about our credits differed - some saying it fitted well this our stalker board and others saying it didn't match. We personally thought that our credits was well incorperated and suited the stalker board that we had and thats why we included it.

No comments:

Post a Comment